University of Saskatchewan > College
of Education > EDCUR
200 > Instructional
Methods
CONCEPT ATTAINMENT
Background
It seems that most of what we do
as humans is categorize or classify objects or events for the purpose of
generalizing. To do this, we must observe
carefully.
To be informed consumers of information, students need to learn that there are
abstractions that humans use to classify. For example, what is the concept of “triangle”?
The abstract qualities that all triangles have in common is three sides, three
angles, and the angles add up to 180°.
Consider this example of classification:
when the British Columbia government decided that photo radar was a legal and
effective way to control speeding, a
person called a radio talk show to say that he thought photo radar was unfair.
Photo radar would mean anyone who drove over the speed limit would be ticketed.
Photo radar would not be able to discriminate between “legitimate speeders
and hard core speeders.” Personally, I had never classified speeders
as legitimate or hard core, and I would have liked to ask him the difference.
This
person had classified speeders into two sub-groups. The rest of our society
might classify one group: speeders. We classify into more precise categories
those
objects, actions, processes which are more important to us.
Each subject area
has different objects, actions, processes classified in different ways. We
want students to be able to read a newspaper article and understand
what they have read in the sense in which it was meant. For example, if they
read a political article, they should understand the way in which political
scientists classify. Even better, our students would be able to guess at some
of the mistakes
the journalist has made in interpreting what the historian, scientist, etc.
actually said. Even better, our students might be able to critique the conclusions
that
the experts (the historian, scientist, etc.) came to.
A concept attainment method
involves students learning to classify a set of objects or events in a way
that the experts classified them. What makes Baroque
music
Baroque and Jazz music Jazz? What characteristics did scientists look at when
deciding some chemicals are acids and some are bases, and some are neither
acids nor bases? The students will be using the categories that experts use,
and will
be attempting to determine the rationale behind the categories.
The Concept
Attainment Method has a high tolerance for ambiguity. This means that the students
might seem to be following the wrong path, but eventually,
they will come up with the expected answer. You would use this method when
the concept the students are expected to learn is possible to learn by studying
examples
of the things or events, and/or when there is no other way of classifying these
objects or events that would be considered correct. For example, if you wanted
your students to learn that sonnets are a particular form of poem, different
from haiku, you could give students samples of sonnets, altogether in one set
called “sonnets”, and of haikus in a set labeled “haikus”,
and have them come up with the characteristics the sonnets had in common that
the haikus did not have. You would use this method instead of just telling
the students what makes a sonnet a sonnet, because students will learn the
material
much better when they figure it out for themselves. As your students learn
more about the classification, you will also learn more about it. As well as
learning
the material better, and remembering it longer, the students will learn how
to learn by using this model. We want students to become independent learners
and
critical thinkers. This method will help them with both these goals. (Have
you ever looked at two foods in the same aisle in the grocery store and wondered
why they were placed together? Grocery stores have, at least it seems so to
me,
the most bizarre classification schemes!)
Typically, concept attainment is done
with small groups of students. It is almost always easier to think critically
and creatively when there is someone
else throwing
ideas into the mix.
Concept Attainment instructional
method facilitates certain of the Common Essential Learnings. The most obvious
are critical and creative
thinking, communication,
and of course, independent learning. Personal and social values and skills
might be included if you help your students work in a positive way with their
peers.
As well, if the particular concept involves mathematical relationships, the
students could use their numeracy. However, classification itself is a type
of numeracy.
You could talk about sets and subsets, or you could use the term “Venn
diagrams”. If the particular concept involves understanding a technology,
technological literacy might also be addressed.
Practicalities
Set up:
- Give your students sets
of materials that have been classified. You also tell them the names of the
categories. For example, you could give your students
fifteen
rocks, organized into three groups: five sedimentary rocks, five igneous,
five metamorphic.
- Tell the students to find the characteristics
that members of one group have in common that are different than the characteristics
of members of
other groups.
In other words, they should try to figure out why the five sedimentary
rocks have been put in one group, and why the five metamorphic rocks have
been
put in a different group than the sedimentary rocks. Etc.
- You might or might
not have activities for the students to do with the materials so the students
will study them in different ways. If you want
them to focus
on the results of these activities for attaining their concepts, you
will ask them to focus on these results. For example, you might have them spill
a little
vinegar on their rock samples, you might have them hit their samples
with
another rock, etc.
- You will probably put your students
into small groups. Choose groups so the students
will work effectively together.
- If you wish to minimize your supervisory
role, choose materials that are relatively safe to work with. If there
will be some danger in
working with the materials,
visualize what sorts of mistakes your students are likely to make.
Then warn them of the dangers in advance. If the materials are really dangerous,
have
them observe you working with the materials.
Carry out:
- The students study the
materials, compare and contrast those that are in the
same group and those that are in the different groups, attempting to determine
the rationale that was used for the classification. As the students are
comparing and contrasting, they will develop different hypotheses, and will
have opportunities
to test their hypotheses by further examination of their materials, and
by discussion in their small groups.
- The teacher’s role at this
stage is to meander through the classroom, observing the students at work.
You
will act as referee and coach. If students are hesitant
about “taking initiative”, or if they are not testing
the materials in a way in which they could, you might encourage them
to go
on with more
tests.
- During this time, you could make
anecdotal records, or fill in checklists or
rating scales of student actions/talk.
Debrief:
For every teaching strategy
involving a debrief, I will suggest a different method. There are a number
of ways in which debriefs can be done.
Please mix and match
the different forms of debriefs you use. In all large group (six
or more students), encourage your students to use their conversation
skills.
(Don’t over-teach
this, though. Tell them only once or twice in the year. Remind them
only when you see that they are forgetting.) Their conversational
skills are to listen
carefully to what other speakers say. Then when they talk, they build
on what others have said, and demonstrate this by using phrases such
as “What I
think is similar to what (another student) said”, or “I
disagree with what (another student) said, because ...” Encourage
them also to speak tentatively with phrases such as “I thought” or “it
seems”.
- Put pairs of small groups together,
so that if you originally had ten small groups of 3 students, you now have
five small groups
of six people.
The groups are to
discuss their observations and the reasons they think the objects
have been classified together. Limit the time they will have for this discussion.
When their time
is up, give them a limited amount of time to come up with a ten word
(or twenty, whatever you think is appropriate) phrase to summarize what they
think
the rationale
is for the classification scheme. Tell the group that they should
select
one member to be the presenter.
- Have each of the larger groups
present their results to the class.
- If your students have
not come up with the rationale they should have, think of why they haven’t.
What background knowledge were they lacking, or what background knowledge
contributed in
a non-subject-area way? What
other materials
might have helped them to form the concept you wanted them
to form?
Check up:
- Once your students have come up
with their rationales for the classification scheme, give them a sample which
is not labeled. They are to
choose which category this non-labeled sample fits in, and explain why they
have classified
it with
this group. Often the new object/action/process is something
that has qualities of more than one of the categories. For example, if you
were having students
classify mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, you could give
the students a bat or a whale to classify. To be really ornery, you could give
them a duck-billed
platypus.
- You could then ask how many groups
changed their classification scheme and how many found a home for the new
object/action/process
and where and why they placed
it where they did.
Hints
- For this teaching model
to work well, the teacher should ensure that the initial samples given
to the
students are the clearest possible prototypes.
In other words, if you had given the students samples of vertebrate animals:
mammals,
birds, fish, reptiles and amphibians, you would not
give them whales and duckbilled platypuses amongst the mammals. These mammals
are
not generally what is expected
of mammals. After the students have come up with the
description of “basic” mammals,
then you could supply the exotic ones.
- Give the students time to develop their definitions of each category.
Do not interrupt them when their first hypotheses are wrong.
If you have set the model
up correctly, the students will come up with the correct
rationales eventually.
Examples of concept attainment
models:
Give your students:
- pictures of
animals which are classified as mammals, fish, reptiles, birds. If
you add skin samples to your selections, you could
also include amphibians.
- samples of music of different styles,
and ask them to determine what characteristics
they have in common within groups and differences
between groups.
- samples of writing genres, classified
according to genre, and have them come
up with characteristics.
- food samples, classified
as fruit, vegetables, grains, red meats, poultry, fish,
dairy, and have them come up with the characteristics.
- a
magnet, and let the magnet choose the materials which are magnetic and
which are not, and then the students attempt
to determine what the qualities of magnetic
materials are versus non-magnetic.
- information
on “developing” countries versus developed countries
and try to find the characteristics,
other than GDP, which make the two groups different.
- any two or more categories,
and the human world is full of them, will be appropriate.