Re: Unknown areas in Gum printing?, etc.
On May 1, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Loris Medici wrote:
Katharine, I beg you please stop implying that people were mocking Jacek - this is absolutely not the fact; eventually you're the only person who takes this incident that way (in other words: who doesn't get it) and turning it into another thing (in other words: twisting it). My comment was referring to the discussion between Christina and Terry King... Tada!Loris, none of my comments referred to you, to anything that you said or did. But if you insist on inserting yourself into the argument, then let me ask why it's necessary for anyone to be laughing at Terry King here either; it's just as disrespectful to make fun of our absent colleagues as our present ones, and makes the list look just as juvenile and silly, or even moreso.
And if you're going to insist on weighing in on that argument, are you prepared to support the insupportable idea that an unhardened gelatin size can't work "because, OF COURSE, the am di in the gum/ pigment mix LOVED the unhardened gelatin and hardened that into a nice complete layer, too."? Perhaps you should have quit while you were ahead.
The mocking was of Terry King and by extension of anyone who has observed that unhardened gelatin can work for a size; this includes me and Jacek and any number of other people. Since your last post was posted before the mocking started, I'm not sure under what logic you have chosen to believe that you were included in my objection, but let me say again, my earlier comments were not directed at you.
Quoting Katharine Thayer <email@example.com>:...