Re: epson 3000 still a viable option?
Yes it is but the technology is quite old and I feel you'd be best served with a newer machine . . . money well spent.
However, if indeed you are really short of money and are just dabbling and don't wish to spend money, go for it and you will
learn a lot. There is nothing wrong with older technology because that is exactly how we all got to here and superb prints
were made with that machine.
On November2007, at 6:26 PM, Erie Patsellis wrote:
I have the ability to get an epson 3000 for cheap (as in free). is it still a viable option for quadtone printing and digital negatives?