[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Authenticity, was RE: Epson or HP for alt-phot ... ? (some OT)
Courts as I understand it _never_ accept a photograph as credible
evidence on its own: it is evidenciary only accompanied by credible
interpretation. Forensic photographs, for example, are used to support
forensic expert testimony, not as "facts" in their own right.
Sam Wang wrote:
> Does anyone know at what point do the courts cease to consider a
> photograph to be creditable evidence?
Website with online galleries and workshop information at: