From: Linas Kudzma (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: 01/01/02-06:57:30 PM Z
Yes, it is quite interesting that I get good results despite a ten-fold
lower amount of metol due to the typo where metol is mentioned in
unblinkingeye.com. I have several negatives that I consider among my best
of 2001 that I developed using the low metol pyrocat.
> [Original Message]
> From: Sandy King <email@example.com>
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: 1/1/2002 5:15:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Pyrocat HD - metol vs phenidone
> I don't remember if the article in Post Factory mentioned metol.
> However, if the formula at Unblinkingeye gives 0.25g of metol per
> 100ml of stock it is in error from my original Pyrocat formula which
> used 2.5g of metol per 100ml of stock A.
> I find it very interesting that your Pyrocat is working so well with
> this small amount of metol. You must be correct in that the metol is
> being regenerated in an superadditive way.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 02/15/02-11:47:41 AM Z CST