The Philosophy in the Community
Lecture & Discussion Series
@ The Refinery
Sponsored by the Department of Philosophy and the College of Arts and Science
Philosophy in the Community is a lecture and discussion series organized by the Philosophy Department at the University of Saskatchewan. It is in place as a public service, so that we may share the rewards and pleasures of philosophical reflection with the members of our community. Philosophical thinking, reading and analysis is part of the life well-lived.
This series is free, no registration is needed. No philosophical background is required; intellectual curiosity is. Coffee provided.
For more information, contact: firstname.lastname@example.org
|Location:|| The Refinery
Emmanuel Anglican (formerly St. James) Church Basement
609 Dufferin Avenue
(at 12th Street, just off Broadway)
|Time:||7:00 – 9:00 PM|
|Dates:||Second Friday of each month (<< Note: new night!),
September through March
|Sep. 11||"Knowledge, Power and Prisons: The Strength and Limitations of Foucault's Critique"
Professor Ria Jenkins
(Philosophy, St, Thomas More College)
What is the connection between knowledge and power? Foucault famously states that knowledge and power "directly imply" one another, and he uses this belief as a basis for his critical analysis of prisons. This talk will explore not just the meaning of this connection for Foucault, but also its strengths and limitations.
|Oct. 9||"Is Liberal Democracy Working for You?"
Professor Charles Smith
|Nov. 13||"When Should We Protect Free Speech?"
Professor Susan Dieleman
Philosophers have provided a variety of arguments in favour of protecting free speech. One of these arguments is the epistemological argument, endorsed most famously by John Stuart Mill, who argues that free speech is valuable because it helps us discover the truth. The only time we’re warranted in limiting free speech, he thinks, is when it’s likely to lead to physical harm. In this presentation, I will suggest that the epistemological argument for free speech can actually lead to a different conclusion: if we’re interested in free speech because it helps us find the truth, then we’re warranted in limiting it not only when it is likely to lead to physical harm, but also when it is likely to lead to humiliation
|Dec. 11||"Free Willusion?"
Professor Dwayne Moore
Humans seem to be free, and moral responsibility may require free will. But, neuroscientific evidence suggests behaviour is determined by physical processes. (How) can we be free if our behaviour is determined by unconscious brain processes? After briefly objecting to several proposed answers to this question, I offer a proposal that secures autonomous agency yet remains consistent with microphysical determinism.
|Jan. 8||"How Do We Deceive Ourselves?"
Professor Leslie Howe
We often say that the self-deceiver lies to him or herself, but a liar knows the truth that he or she denies to another. How can one person be both liar and dupe? This apparent paradox has led many to either deny that self-deception is possible or to attempt to resolve the paradox in a way that also ends up eliminating the phenomenon. Yet, self-deception seems a clearly recognisable, and constant, feature of our daily lives. This talk will explore the problem of what self-deception is, how we do it, and why.
|Feb. 12||"God and Evil"
Professor Eric Dayton
Can the existence of evil be reconciled with the existence of an all-good, omnipotent, all-knowing God? This talk will present the traditional argument known as the problem of evil, and will consider the problem in relation to the nature of belief and rational judgement, and the understanding of morality
|Mar. 11||"Rebooting the Enlightenment?
Professor Pierre-Francois Noppen
To many progressive thinking appears to be in a deadlock. Have we exhausted the critical resources of the Enlightenment? Has our nature finally caught up with our aspirations? Or is the world we have created simply out of hand? This talk will examine recent arguments for the rebooting of the Enlightenment. At issue will be the question of Enlightenment’s blind spots and some resources available to progressive thinking.