Ladd, Tony and James A. Mathisen.
Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books. 2002. 288 pp ISBN: 0801058473
$20.99 USD (PB).
[1] In their book Muscular Christianity:
Evangelical Protestants and the Development of American Sports,
James A. Mathisen and Tony Ladd present an historical and sociological
portrait of "Muscular Christianity" rich in anecdotes
about both legendary figures and myriad evangelical organizations.
[2] Mathisen and Ladd, both professors at the
evangelically-identified institution of higher education, Wheaton
College (in the sociology and kinesiology departments, respectively),
regale their readers with fascinating stories about the origins
of the confluence of sport and evangelicalism in the 19th
century They identify as their starting point the evangelical
Studd brothers in England, the preeminent cricket stars of that
era, and the arrival of Muscular Christianity in America via the
popularity of the Thomas Hughes novel Tom Brown at Oxford
and the 1885 tour of American colleges by J.E.K. Studd The evangelical
context of the creation of basketball in 1891 by James Naismith,
an "American Tom Brown" at the YMCA's Springfield, Massachusetts,
summer institute, and modern coaching, attributed to Amos Alonzo
Stagg, the legendary turn-of-the-century University of Chicago
athletic director, reveals an aspect of American cultural history
that is rarely discussed Mathisen and Ladd's narrative recounts
the tradition of evangelical testimonials by sports figures through
the twentieth century, most notably telling the tales of Gil Dodds,
the "new Tom Brown" and preeminent American miler of
the 1940s (associated with Billy Graham), and Bill Glass, the
former Detroit Lion and Cleveland Brown, who evangelized his fellow
athletes and used football as a means to reach American youngsters
[3] More problematic are the boundaries of
Muscular Christianity Ladd and Mathisen acknowledge that there
is no univocal description of the phenomenon, although they identify
its 19th century incarnation with "manliness,"
moral righteousness, and "man's dominion over the earth."
These principles of Muscular Christianity were promoted largely
by certain seminal figures including Dwight L. Moody, the Chicago
evangelist, associated with the Midwestern YMCA, who saw in the
movement a vehicle to advance his brand of premillennialist evangelism,
and Robert McBurney, who emphasized physical well-being itself
as a blessing and led the national YMCA to a more accommodationist
approach to the broader culture
[4] Mathisen and Ladd hang these anecdotes
on a sociological framework which postulates that the relationship
of evangelicalism to sports has been one of engagement (during
the late 19th century), disengagement (through the
1930s), and reengagement (since World War II) They attribute
the disengagement in part to the rhetorical stance of Billy Sunday,
an ex-baseball star, who argued that baseball was not a model
for the evangelical Christian life, and in part to the rise of
fundamentalist separationism Although they note the Lynds' study
of Middletown in the 1920s which revealed a pervasive and growing
secularization of American life beneath a veneer of religious
identification, they do not present any convincing explanation
for this disengagement Religion, they conclude, "simply
lost its ties to culture." Likewise they offer little in
the way of explanation of why reengagement occurred in the post-war
era, except by noting the rise of evangelical entrepreneurs who
spawned sport-identified mission organizations (like Sports Ambassadors,
the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, Campus Crusade for Christ,
and Athletes in Action), sports chaplaincies (like Baseball Chapel
and Pro Athletes Outreach), and sports programs at evangelical
megachurches
[5] What they do observe, however, is a radical
shift from 19th century Muscular Christian beliefs
in sport itself as a progenitor of values (e.g., manliness and
moral righteousness) to the use of sports largely as a vehicle
to attract the attention of non-evangelicals and to legitimize
evangelical and fundamentalist colleges and universities (e.g.,
Oral Roberts University and Jerry Falwell's Liberty University)
in the eyes of mainstream culture But, as their anecdote concerning
Bill McCartney (the evangelical University of Colorado football
coach and founder of the "Promisekeepers" movement)
and Colorado's scandalous national football championship (secured
on a "fifth" down) shows, evangelicalism increasingly
serves the ideology of "winning."
[6] To be sure the last chapter of the book
sketches out other elements of Muscular Christianity's modern
incarnation: meritocratic democracy, competitive virtue, heroic
models, and therapeutic self-controlHowever, what is notably
absent from the book, aside from a few passing allusions, is any
sustained analysis of the relationship of Muscular Christianity
to the ideologies of male domination and white supremacy The
relationship of Muscular Christianity to misogyny and racism is
given short shrift as if this phenomenon avoided the ills which
plagued the rest of American society since its very beginnings
This lapse is especially glaring in light of the historical domination
of Muscular Christianity by white, conservative malesòat least
until the more recent incorporation of black male athletes within
its ranks It is as if evangelical Christianity's theology of
Christological "sinlessness" has undergone a metamorphosis
into an historical, corporate social reality But this weakness
to the text may be attributed to the authors' confessional orientation
that bleeds through the academic palimpsest of the book Non-evangelical
readers will note that evangelicals are consistently referred
to as Christiansòas if other members of mainstream Protestant
denominations and Catholics are not And the authors' lament
that one evangelical sports magazine "missed opportunities
to offer more realistically and biblically based understandings
of modern sport"òas if "biblically based understandings"
represented a form of "right thinking." Muscular Christianity
therefore is depicted as largely benign with little, if any, negative
impact on American culture as a whole Those looking for academic
muck-raking on the Muscular Christian movement will find nothing
here Nonetheless, with these caveats in mind, this book fills
a gap in the literature on the movement and the reader may well
profit from the countless stories of evangelical Christians interwoven
with an aspect of American society which has become our very own
post-modern religion
James McBride, Ph.D., J.D., Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, New
York, NY