Romanowski, William D. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press.
2001. 171 pp. $12.99 USD. ISBN: 1587430096.
[1] William Romanowski uses examples from
television, film, and music to clarify what a Christian media
message might look like and what it could mean to engage the
media as a Christian critic. These possibilities are articulated
across ten chapters and two appendices that introduce readers
to a Christian worldview, the scope of popular media, and
the potential benefits of bringing the two together in thoughtful
and constructive critiques of culture. Readers already familiar
with the development of popular culture studies might find
chapters four and five a bit redundant, as this is where Romanowski
discusses the high-low culture split and argues that there
is value to be found in popular cultural messages. Ultimately
the book is a worthwhile endeavor.
[2] The title of chapter one, "Christians
Who Drink Beer," encapsulates Romanowski's view that
it is impossible to give essential definitions of Christian
audiences. He notes that with few exceptions it is not possible
for Christians to live outside the reach of popular culture
and besides, he posits, the vast majority of audiences identifying
themselves as Christian are spending considerably less time
interacting with Christian media than they are with popular
culture. Romanowski urges readers to define themselves as
an audience by forming and engaging in interpretive communities
with friends, colleagues, clergy, educators, and critics who
share a common worldview. Arguing from Genesis 1:28 ("Be
fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue
it"), Romanowski asserts that actively engaging in cultural
creation and criticism is established by Scripture.
[3] Romanowski holds that popular culture
texts - whether in songs, television, or film - come to have
meaning through our working engagement with them. As a consequence
he urges readers to reject hypodermic needle metaphors that
imagine the media as a secularizing or indoctrinating force.
Romanowski similarly rejects criticism that seeks to dichotomize
the world into the profane and the secular. He cleverly parallels
this rhetorical move with polarizing the principles of good
and evil and high and low culture. Romanowski argues that
such facile distinctions not only weaken the Christian position
but also miss the function of criticism to redeem and recuperate
the meanings of cultural texts. In doing this he is establishing
that the media need not always be suitable for children and
families in order to be relevant to a Christian critic. Nor
should it be expected to contain the appropriate number of
JPMs ("Jesuses per Minute"), the criterion by which
Christian music is often scrutinized (139). He instead asserts:
We need popular art to ... open our eyes
to injustice, express our emotions, show us the humor in
situations, depict the grief, hardships, and struggles of
everyday life, and help us understand the calm of forgiveness
and the meaning of redemption (81).
It is not an acceptable position to dismiss
popular culture outright because it is violent, sexual, or
materialistic in content. The conscientious critic needs a
worldview that allows for the way that culture is and encompasses
a view of how the culture could or ought to be if one adheres
to particular faith principles. One's worldview, Romanowski
notes, should be creative and discerning as it is applied
to understanding the popular.
[4] In the conclusion, Romanowski offers
a three-level method for reading a popular text on the basis
of subject, content, and evaluation. Working within this method,
he offers an ample matrix of questions in Appendix One that
readers can use to guide their readings. Questions are grouped
under headings - including sexuality, violence, redemption,
aesthetic, and perception - to allow readers to select subject
areas appropriate to their text. The matrix is thorough, but
one weakness of the book is that Romanowski does not spend
more time elaborating this method and matrix, making it a
more central focus in the book. Placing the model and matrix
at the end positions the work of criticism as an afterthought,
especially for readers who may not venture past the conclusion.
This seems to conflict with Romanowski's assertion that actively
working through culture should be the readers' goal. Appendix
one also directs readers to the book's website (www.brazospress.comeyeswideopen/),
which provides chapter outlines, resources, and activities
for teachers and students, and helps the general reader who
may be seeking ways to introduce this material to friends
and family.
[5] Appendix Two offers an example of the
type of Christian criticism that Romanowski advocates, using
the film Titanic. Despite being a thoughtful critique
that illustrates many of Romanowski's points, this appendix
is problematic for two reasons. First, by the time of publication,
Titanic was already four years old. Second, it isn't
entirely clear why Romanowski chooses Titanic as his
model, since, throughout the book, he teases readers with
thumbnail critiques of The End of the Affair and American
Beauty that seem to be much richer interpretive turf.
They connect with the themes of sexuality, infidelity, drug
use, violence, family, and faith, themes from which Romanowski
urges critics not to shy away. It would have been more relevant
to have the second appendix expand upon one of these two other
films, since they receive brief but intriguing treatments
in the body of the book.
[6] This book has several potential audiences.
The first is an audience of Christians who question either
the sanctity or the purpose of looking for the profane within
the popular. The second is the educated reader with interests
in popular media and a working understanding of Christianity.
Ultimately this book could be of greatest interest to teachers
of undergraduate courses in media and rhetorical criticisms,
in particular because Romanowski urges them to take up his
challenge and become active cultural consumers, interpreters,
and critics.
Gordon Alley-Young, Department of Speech Communication, Southern
Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois
(GordYng@aol.com)