
Responding to the Needs of Aboriginal Peoples
At its May 23, 2002 meeting, University Council approved the following motions.
The rationale for these motions is described in the Planning Committee report entitled �Responding to the Needs of Aboriginal Peoples�.
MOTION #1: That departments and colleges establish effective academic support services for Aboriginal students, for the fall of 2002.MOTION #2: That departments and colleges be encouraged to create enriched transition classes for Aboriginal students.
MOTION #3: That a task force on academic preparedness for Aboriginal students be established by the administration and Council to prepare a report on recommended actions.
MOTION #4: That given the high priority of the Aboriginal Goal for the University, the Budget Committee should examine the funding of programs for academic support, enriched transition and outreach for Aboriginal students.
MOTION #5: That in conjunction with progress in creating capacity and support for Aboriginal students, the University should develop a focused communications process to increase recruitment and retention of Aboriginal students.
MOTION #6: That the Capital Planning Committee be asked to investigate the issue of an Aboriginal Student lounge/meeting facility.
MOTION #7: That the Academic Programs Committee be asked to investigate the issue of Aboriginal language instruction on campus.
MOTION #8: That the Planning Committee be instructed to report back to Council next spring on the progress which has been made toward implementation of the above recommendations.
Responding to the Needs of Aboriginal Peoples
Final Report
May 23, 2002
I. Background
In A Framework for Planning at the University of Saskatchewan (March, 1998) the goal of Responding to the Needs of Aboriginal Peoples is described as follows:
In Saskatchewan, the task of responding to specific, local needs and, simultaneously opening doors to the world, is particularly pressing in the context of aboriginal peoples. Making available to aboriginal peoples the full resources of the University is one side of that equation; integrating aboriginal knowledge into the curriculum and practices of the University is the other. At the University of Saskatchewan we must dedicate ourselves to making available to all aboriginal peoples the full range of our programs and we must adopt strategies that will improve their ability to succeed. Above all, the University must appreciate the need for aboriginal peoples to have an effective, meaningful voice in their own educational experience and, in true partnership, to find in the University a place where their culture is both reflected and at work in defining and achieving the institution�s objectives in research, teaching and community service.In January of 2000, several Chairs of Council committees requested a meeting with President MacKinnon (Chair of Council Ron Cuming, Budget chair Bob Gander, Capital Planning chair Joe Angel, Planning chair Jene Porter, Research co-chairs Morris Altman and Murray Fulton, Instructional Development chair Jim Thornhill). At that meeting there was a general discussion about what initiatives could be developed at the University level to implement this Framework for Planning goal.
When organizations wish to implement a major change, they must take action in two areas. First, they must re-structure so that attention can be focused on an issue, i.e., the new major change cannot just be placed on somebody�s desk. Second, they need to provide funding so that the change can be actually implemented. The President agreed to both.
As a consequence, Professor Ernie Walker was approached to begin the process of studying how the University could respond to the needs of Aboriginal peoples and the necessary funding was made available for this task. The Conceptual Framework for Aboriginal Initiatives contains a number of new initiatives, including appointment of a senior-level administrator to focus on Aboriginal issues at the University of Saskatchewan. This position has been established and an appointment is now in process.
II. Subcommittee
The Planning Committee, at its November 7, 2000 meeting, established a Subcommittee on Responding to the Needs of Aboriginal Peoples (usually called the Aboriginal Goal Subcommittee) with the following Terms of Reference:
The Subcommittee will:
1. Review the progress that has been made toward achieving the goal of Responding to the Needs of Aboriginal Peoples.
2. Determine additional strategies for the Planning Committee and Council which will help the University achieve these goals.
Such strategies could include changes in University or College policies, introduction of new or revised programs, development of additional student services, etc.
3. Recommend a priority list for discussion in the University community and at Council.
The Subcommittee was not active in 2000-2001, when the Office of the Vice-President Academic was developing its Conceptual Framework for Aboriginal Programs. The Subcommittee began meeting in the fall of 2001, after a draft of the Conceptual Framework had been shown to Council and Senate.
III. Members
Because the Framework addresses instruction issues and academic programs, the Subcommittee agreed to expand its membership in January, 2002, to include representatives from the Instructional Development Committee and the Academic Programs Committee.
Planning Committee: Jene Porter (Chair), Ruth Thompson, Bill Slights, Ted Leighton, John Thompson
Academic Programs Committee: Sam Robinson
Instructional Development Committee: Len Gusthart
Secretary: Cathie Fornssler
The Subcommittee was also grateful for the assistance of Pauline Melis, from the Office of the Vice-President Academic and Provost, who attended several Subcommittee meetings and who also assembled�Aboriginal Programs and Services at the University of Saskatchewan: A Comprehensive List of Initiatives�.
IV. Discussions
As well as discussing the proposed Conceptual Framework, the Subcommittee also discussed Council�s role in responding to the needs of Aboriginal people. The Subcommittee agreed that the focus of Council and of the Planning Committee should be on academic programs.
The Subcommittee had very productive and useful discussions with the following people:
- Ernie Walker, who provided an overview of the Conceptual Framework issues
- Beth Horsburg, Native Access Program for Nursing (NAPN). The Aboriginal Nursing Advisor is Val Arnault.
- Orest Murawsky and Ken Jacknicke, Indian Teacher Education Program (ITEP)
- Ruth Thompson and Beth Bilson, Program of Legal Studies for Native People (PLSNP) and Native Law Centre
- Keith Jeffrey, David Cowan and David Male, Cameco Access Program for Engineering and Science (CAPES)
- Kathleen Makala, Aboriginal Students� Centre
- Charlotte Ross, Coordinator for Aboriginal programs, Dean�s Office, College of Arts and Science
- Ron Laliberte and Hans Michelmann, Department of Native Studies
- Angela Bellegarde and Lou Hammond-Ketilson,Commerce Indigenous Business Administration program (CIBA) and other programs
- Priscilla Settee and Leanne Fiddler, Extension�s Indigenous Peoples Program (IPP)
V. Conclusions
The University of Saskatchewan offers outstanding programs for Aboriginal students, managed by impressive and committed faculty and staff. The meetings with these faculty, administrators and staff demonstrated to the Subcommittee the significant progress which has already been made in colleges toward developing programs for Aboriginal students.
We have on campus a knowledgeable and experienced leadership and proven programs that should be used to expand the University�s response to the Aboriginal goal. The List of Initiatives provides details of the Aboriginal programs and services now available at the University of Saskatchewan.
The Aboriginal Teacher Education Programs (ATEP) for Aboriginal and Northern students have been in existence for three decades. These include ITEP, SUNTEP and NORTEP programs. These long standing and successful programs have graduated more than 1,500 teachers and provided the committee with an example of a curriculum focusing on Aboriginal needs and in close collaboration with communities. More than 100 ATEP graduates are now enrolled in or have graduated from graduate studies. ITEP director Orest Murawsky provided the Subcommittee with an example of a curriculum focusing on Aboriginal needs: Elders program, Aboriginal content, Aboriginal languages.
The Program of Legal Studies for Native People (PLSNP) in the Native Law Centre has proven instrumental in the graduation of more than 500 lawyers over the last 30 years, and provided an example of a preparatory program which focuses on skills acquisition. Since the program began using a skills-based curriculum 15 years ago, more than 80 per cent of its students have continued successfully to receive a law degree.
The professional programs in Nursing, Commerce and Engineering demonstrate how important it is to establish connections with Aboriginal communities and leaders, and to employ Aboriginal staff to provide services to students. These programs are doing an outstanding job, not only in preparing Aboriginal students for careers but also in recruiting Aboriginal students to University.
New faculty positions are being established in the Department of Native Studies to keep up with the demand for its courses. The department teaches 2,500 undergraduate students a year and up to a dozen graduate students (3CUE equivalent), with a faculty complement of only 7.4 positions. In the College of Education, the Indian and Northern Education Program faculty, who are all Aboriginal, teach primarily graduate courses in Aboriginal education: Aboriginal epistemology, Aboriginal world views, de-colonolization and healing.
The Indigenous Peoples program in Extension is providing valuable outreach and leadership programs, and is developing language programs which Aboriginal communities feel are essential to support cultural growth.
Kathleen Makela (Aboriginal Students� Centre) and Charlotte Ross (Coordinator of Aboriginal Programs in Arts and Science) told the committee of the enormous challenges faced by many Aboriginal students. Many are single parents, whose high school preparation may have been poor, who are often the first in their family to attend university, whose financial support is limited, particularly for Metis students, and whose families or community may be grappling with poverty, alcohol abuse, and imprisonment.
The goal of Responding to the Needs of Aboriginal Peoples states that the University should be a place where Aboriginal people find �their culture is both reflected and at work� in programs. The Planning Committee confirms the importance of this aspect of the goal in terms both of University curricula and governance structures, and confirmed many examples of its integration by the faculty and staff in University programs.
The following elements are common to these successful programs:
MOTION #1: That departments and colleges establish effective academic support services for Aboriginal students, for the fall of 2002.
MOTION #2: That departments and colleges be encouraged to create enriched transition classes for Aboriginal students.
MOTION #3: That a task force on academic preparedness for Aboriginal students be established by the administration and Council to prepare a report on recommended actions.
MOTION #4: Given the high priority of the Aboriginal Goal for the University, the Budget Committee should examine the funding of programs for academic support, enriched transition and outreach for Aboriginal students.
MOTION #5: In conjunction with progress in creating capacity and support for Aboriginal students, the University should develop a focused communications process to increase recruitment and retention of Aboriginal students.
MOTION #6: The Capital Planning Committee be asked to investigate the issue of an Aboriginal Student lounge/meeting facility.
MOTION #7: The Academic Programs Committee be asked to investigate the issue of Aboriginal language instruction on campus.
MOTION #8: That the Planning Committee be instructed to report back to Council next spring on the progress which has been made toward implementation of the above recommendations.