Research Theme - Socio-hydrology

Stage 2: Facilitated Empathy for Water Security in the Saskatchewan River Basin

This project engages a larger number than the pilot A Collaborative Approach to Understanding Water Security in the Saskatchewan River Basin and uses a revised methodolgy following stakeholder input and results from the 2012 workshops. Beginning in January 2014, it takes place over two years and aims to capture paticipants' cultural preferences, views about governance and social relations using various social science research tools. The final phase of the project uses information gathered to faciliate participants' understanding of each others point of view in an experimental setting. The goal is to reveal gaps between actual choices and perceived choices made by members of the water management community in the river basin. 

To register for the survey, click here. For more information contact socio-hydrology research associate Graham Strickert at graham.strickert@usask.ca

The above projects are partially funded through the Social Science and Humanities Research Council and the Changing Cold Regions Network

 

Pilot Project: A Collaborative Approach to Defining Water Security in the Saskatchewan River Basin

The Global Institute for Water Security hosted a series of workshops in spring, summer and fall 2012 to find out how people engaged in the water sector in the Saskatchewan River Basin personally define water security. Stakeholders representing a range of interests in water and water management were invited to attend. The final attendance list represented municipalities, farmers, industry, environmental groups, First Nations and Metis, and water scientists and managers. Workshops were held in Kananaskis and Medicine Hat, Alberta, and Saskatoon, Nipawin and Cumberland House, Saskatchewan. Each workshop followed the same format and took participants through several exercises to gather information about their thoughts and experiences regarding governance, resource stresses, policy and other perceived opportunities for, and threats to, current and future water security in the Saskatchewan River Basin.

The data gathered from these conversations will help feed into the types of scientific questions GIWS researchers should be examining, and help us understand water security on the Prairies.

Downstream

a play by Kenneth T. Williams, playwright-in-residence, U of S Drama Department

In a new and novel approach, the analysis of data gathered from the 2012 workshop series was communicated to and assessed by stakeholders through a travelling play titled Downstream. Performances took place throughout Saskatchewan and Alberta during February 2014.

The play conveyed dramatized perspectives of water security in the Saskatchewan River Basin and was a collaboration with the U of S Drama Department. Audience members participated throughout the performance and a focus group of decision makers followed the play. 



Socio-hydrology Research Theme

Socio-hydrology is a new area of research that integrates people and their activities into water science. The Global Institute for Water Security recognizes that at the heart of water security is the ability of water systems to meet changing human and environmental needs. Socio-hydrology research ensures that decisions made about our water resources incorporate a range of values and perspectives about the meaning, value and use of water. At the Decision Centre for a Desert City at Arizona State University

Social scientists bring an interest in human values, markets, social organizations and political institutions to the traditional focus of water science on climate and hydrology.  Increasingly, it is recognized that some of the most critical vulnerabilities in contemporary water systems lie at the intersection between human activities and physical systems, such as when governance systems are incapable of dealing with climate-induced changes in water supply. 

Social scientists study societal responses to water stresses like flooding and drought and investigate the potential of existing and new economic and other policy instruments to help communities make sound decisions under uncertainty. The institute’s socio-hydrology team members ensure that social science questions are given a consideration throughout the research activities and incorporated across research themes. 

Theme Objectives:

  •  Build relationships with stakeholder communities to develop a common understanding of their values and what they identify as threats to water security
  •  Understand divergent perspectives on the definition of water security and the major driving forces for future insecurity
  •  Assess the social and natural science questions deemed important by stakeholder communities and draw on local knowledge to inform the research
  •  Study societal response to water stress and to economic and policy instruments
  •  Inform policy options to address water uncertainty and impediments to effective water governance

Working group membership:

Douglas Clark (lead), Howard Wheater, Patricia Gober, Maureen Reed, John Pomeroy, Bram Noble, Lalita Bharadwaj, Marcia McKenzie, Bob PatricK



 

water