1st ISAE North American Regional Meeting
University of Guelph, Ontario Canada
June 5, 1994

BACK TO GUELPH 1994 TITLES

BACK TO MEETINGS MAIN PAGE
 

Effects of stress on maternal behaviour in pigs
J. Rushen1, A.M. de Passille1, J. Ladewig2 and G. Foxcroft3
1Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Lennoxville, Canada; 2Animal Husbandry & Behaviour, Trenthorst, Germany, and
3University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Little is known of how stress affects maternal behaviour in pigs. Many nursings are unsuccesful and piglets get no milk. Stress is often considered the cause, but there is little evidence. We examined if lactating sows in novel environments have more unsuccessful nursings. Six sows (3-14d postpartum) were either placed with their piglets for 2h in a different farrowing pen, or were driven into the new pen and immediately returned to their own (control). All sows were subject to both treatments over two days, with the order of treatments being balanced. Nursings were recorded as successful if there was increased rate of grunting by the sow and rapid sucking by the piglets. Blood was sampled every 10 min and assayed for ACTH and cortisol. Placing the sow in the novel pen did not significantly increase the latency to the first nursing attempt, but the proportion of nursings that failed was much higher (51% versus 8%, P<.01), and the latency to the first successful nursing was longer than in the home pen (P<.01). Cortisol and ACTH concentrations were not ncreased in the novel environment (P>0.10), and neither cortisol nor ACTH were higher before an unsuccessful nursing than before a successful one (P>0.10). An unfamiliar environment increases the chance that a nursing will fail to lead to milk ejection, thus demonstrating that some unsuccessful nursings result from stress, but the effect is not mediated by hypothalamo-pituitary-adreno-cortical (HPA) activity, throwing doubt on the value of this traditional index of stress. To
determine the role of opioid peptides in stress-induced inhibition of nursing, 10 sows (3-7d postpartum), had their piglets removed for 2h, and were treated as follows. 1. No treatment, 2. Nose-snare restraint for 20 min., 3. Naloxone injections (i.v. 2mg/kg), 4. Snare + naloxone. After the treatment, the piglets were returned, milk ejections were timed, and the sows' blood sampled every 10 min. for cortisol, GH and prolactin assays. Restraint increased cortisol (P<.05) but did not delay the first milk ejection or reduce the frequency of nursings. No unsuccessful nursings were observed and successful milk ejections occurred when cortisol levels were elevated. Piglet removal increased cortisol and decreased prolactin and GH (P<.05). The rise in GH when piglets were returned was prevented by the combination of restraint and naloxone, but not by restraint alone. Opioids protect lactogenic hormones against behavioural stress, but stress-induced HPA activity does not inhibit milk ejection in the pig. Stress is often considered a nonspecific HPA reaction to environmental challenges but the concept should be broadened to include specific disruptions of biological functions via other neuroendocrine pathways.
 
 

BACK TO ISAE CANADIAN REGIONAL HOMEPAGE